waiting to send decision to author nature

The exact content of your reminder email will be situation-specific, but there are a few components to include no matter the circumstances. For full book submissions, editors are now moving into the peer review phase, which takes time, time, and more time. Answers to questions all researchers have about the journal decision-making process, questions that authors generally have about the editorial decision making process, possible editorial decisions on a manuscript. Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the. We are the change that we seek. Make it known that you are interested in how the application process is progressing. Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted from the interplay of his temperament and . window.ga=window.ga||function(){(ga.q=ga.q||[]).push(arguments)};ga.l=+new Date; Essentially, the concept of relativity in decision-making says: People assign value to things by comparing one thing to another. 8,9 One journal editorial went as far as to say "Unanimity between reviewers is rare." Or check for grocery list apps for the iPhone. Manuscript # . 1. Greeting. peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript. It was 3 a.m. on a freezing November night in 1994. LZ. .comments-link { 5 min read, Communicating effectively with journals: What authors need to know The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). Make your own hope. .tag_list a{background:url(http://www.lars-t-schlereth.com/wp-content/themes/theron_pro/images/icons.png) no-repeat; background-position: 0px -25px;} 1. Paulo Coelho, By the River Piedra I Sat Down and Wept. Feel the supporting soil underneath. This template takes a 'content first' approach with minimal formatting. It is common for peer reviewers to give conflicting feedback on the same manuscript. The timeframe for proofing varies between journals. n/a Rejected (im.) padding: 0 !important; Cell was launched in 1974 as the "journal of exciting biology." Spend a few breaths embodying this strong, supportive energy. Typically, after a paper is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. Nature of underlying . $14.50 10 Used from $10.22 17 New from $13.94. Thus, it is a boon to authors who are no longer vulnerable to losing out on important suggestions for change before publication, merely due to cluttered email. (3) Its content is irrelevant to the journal . This status shows that based on the revisions and the authors responses to the reviewer comments, the editor has made a final decision of rejecting the paper. Whereas most journals provide detailed guidelines for the format of the research paper, they rarely, if ever, explain what various statuses displayed on the article tracking system denote. Below is a breakdown of current fees based on article type and submission date. Each review is due in ten days, and many of them do arrive in two weeks. It should take at least a few weeks for rereview and the editor to make a decision after your revision (if the previous decision was B, then much less). Barack Obama. background: none !important; Why don't we give you complete access! In some of our previous articles, we have attempted to provide answers to questions that authors generally have about the editorial decision making process and the possible editorial decisions on a manuscript. The editor and the editorial team decide whether or not to send the manuscript out to review; the corresponding author is contacted with the decision. Once a manuscript is submitted, the online article tracking system allows authors to follow the journey of their manuscript. However, authors sometimes find the status changes confusing and get worried. Revise. Collapse. By practicing decision . .comm_date{ background:url(http://www.lars-t-schlereth.com/wp-content/themes/theron_pro/images/icons.png) no-repeat;background-position: 0px 3px;} If you disagree with the decision If we decide your disability benefits will stop, and you disagree, you can appeal our decision. The editor contacts the author with the decision. Revised Manuscript Submitted: This indicates that the author has submitted the revised document. Social Security Disability examiners usually send you to a consultative examination (usually called a CE) if your own medical sources are inadequate to determine whether or not you are disabled under Social Security . Peer reviewers are busy scientists, and peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript. //-->